Talk:Genichi Taguchi
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Genichi Taguchi be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
References
editI added a tag about references. Taguchi may be extremely important, but this writeup has hallmarks of non-NPOV, e.g., "it was controversial, but is now accepted as important", "very influential", the only external link is a photograph (!), etc. References would help support strong claims like that, or facts would help make this more NPOV.
dfrankow (talk) 22:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Say, I've added several internal citations, and therefore removed the unsourced tag. I'm thinking that wasn't the proper procedure, and I should ask others to judge whether the sources are sufficient to warrant the removal of the tag. What do you think? Kjtobo (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kjtobo, I'm not sure whether to remove the BLP sources tag. The article looks somewhat better to me, although I haven't reviewed in depth. I wish it had sources for the strongest or most positive statements:
- "but others have accepted many of the concepts introduced by him as valid extensions to the body of knowledge."
- "Taguchi's work includes three principal contributions to statistics:"
- "he was beginning to consult widely in Japanese industry"
- "Taguchi has made a very influential contribution to industrial statistics"
- "growing enthusiasm for his methodology..."
- Again, I'm not saying he hasn't done these things. It's just all the positive statements are unsourced. dfrankow (talk) 17:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Let's keep the tag. While I think the article is broadly correct, more sources will certainly improve it. [1] Jayen466 18:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
141.140.6.60
editThis sentence seems to be the central one of the whole article:
- Taguchi's innovation was to replicate each experiment by means of an outer array, itself an orthogonal array that seeks deliberately to emulate the sources of variation that a product would encounter in reality.
Unfortunately, the sentence is utterly unintelligible. What is an "outer array" or an "orthogonal array"? Could we see a tiny example? 141.140.6.60 00:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
The article keeps mentioning "Western statisticians" at least a dozen times. Is there any palpable distinction between "Western" and "Eastern" statisticians, and if so, do the Eastern statisticians accept his methods? 141.140.6.60 00:32, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
Loss functions - theorem
editItalicized part (from a previous editor) moved here from main page:
The squared-error loss function had been used by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern in the 1930s. There is a theorem I think - help appreciated
Overlap between Genichi Taguchi and Taguchi methods
editIs there any reason that the page 'Genichi Taguchi' is almost identical to the page 'Taguchi Methods'? The only difference is the first paragraph and the section on 'Life'. 202.180.110.18 (talk) 22:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well spotted; I have inserted a brief summary here, with a link to the main article. We should not have the same text in both articles. --Jayen466 23:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Genichi Taguchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402001648/http://www.amsup.com:80/about.htm to http://www.amsup.com/about.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Genichi Taguchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019015145/http://www.asiusa.com/thought-leadership/news-and-events/167-death-of-dr-taguchi to http://www.asiusa.com/thought-leadership/news-and-events/167-death-of-dr-taguchi
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.amsup.com/about.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)