This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Body Modification, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Body ModificationWikipedia:WikiProject Body ModificationTemplate:WikiProject Body ModificationBody Modification articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Having difficulty finding any reference sources useful in terms of definition of what items constitute valid genital jewellery. However, several sources do use the term, in a manner implying general understanding of the term as descriptive of (at least some of) the objects described in the article. eg.
Other than these, and those already cited in the article, most search results are for sales of these items - where catalogue lists include most, if not all of the items indicated in the article.
Per the deletion discussion, probably worth holding on to the article to allow additional (useful) references to surface. Best wishes --Haruth (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Reading references that have been posted so far, there doesn't seem to be much about jewellery as much as passing mentions related to genital piercing, which is why I boldly made the redirect despite surviving the AfD (without sources to prove notability!). Seems to me, with the lack of material on genital jewellery, the proper course of action should be to merge any relevant content to genital piercing, as its own section, unless there's enough sources to show that genital jewellery not involving piercing exists and is notable.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 12:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I can't help but get the feeling that this article exists solely to display the inordinate (yes, three can be inordinate) number of photos that current make up the bulk of the page. Even Wikipedia should be better than this.--172.190.185.19 (talk) 01:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The unsourced suggestion that “some genital jewelry has been around since the Victorian times” is a plain myth and should be removed from the page. There is no historical evidence for Prince Albert to have had such a piercing and the earliest attribution of such a piercing is attested to the 1960s or 1970s. 2600:1700:C430:22A0:75B6:A213:21F2:46A1 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I propose merging this article into Genital piercing and keeping this as a redirect. Everything discussed here is discussed there, and better- jewellery is discussed, piercing types and reasoning are discussed, etc. The only thing that doesn't seem to get a mention is buttplugs. Not to mention that this article seems to basically be a collection of trivia, some of which is unsourced or blatantly untrue like the Prince Albert myth.
.svg){kind=small}
