 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Genocide studies be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | The Comparative genocide article was blanked and that title now redirects to Genocide studies. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2021 and 15 October 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madisonodell5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Done
editThere's an OA article published in Genocide Studies and Prevention by by Israel Charny that includes references to the history of unnamed versions of genocide-studies related Wikipedia articles. It's likely to be useful for this article. Boud (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There appears to be some misunderstanding of the non-use of quotation marks in the essay, which says that the Wikipedia authors
... quote Lemkin that such genocide is 'the annihilation of a group's culture even if the group themselves are not completely destroyed.'3
where footnote 3 saysThe quote was provided by the Wikipedia writers. At the time of my writing this essay, its content is accurate; however, it is unclear from which source the quote was taken from.
The original insertion appears to be this edit on 04:51, 26 April 2017 with a fix of the misspelling two years later on 11:14, 13 May 2019, and that still matches the current version. I don't see any sign of the use of quotation marks. BothThe conclusion made is that ...
andHe concludes that ...
indicate that Wikipedia describes the meaning of what Lemkin says, which might have some overlap in wording (e.g. to the extent that the original words are the best and simplest available), but is not intended as a direct quote. I don't have access to the source, but Charny effectively agrees with us that the description should be written without quotation marks, since it does not claim to be a quote. Boud (talk) 15:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Done I added some content from A Personal Autobiographical Essay on the Origins and Beginning Years of Genocide Studies, and Some Reflections on the Field Today (Q127976569) to the history section. There are still some notable pieces of info that could be summarised from the source and are not yet present in the Wikipedia article. Boud (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
