Talk:Geofence

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Frost in topic Requested move 22 July 2024

Inaccurate term?

edit

The most common use of this term is "geo-fence" not "geofence." This article uses erroneous nomenclature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

What is the source for this "most common" claim and that "geofencing" is erroneous nomenclature? Testing this claim using Google shows that "geofencing" is more common for Google Search, Google News and Google Books. Only Google Scholar shows a slight edge for "geo fencing". I can't see how the single-word versions are erroneous nomenclature. Note that result counts for the two-word versions are not as reliable as they are based on the intersections of the individual words.[1]
Term Google Search Google News Google Books Google Scholar Citations
"geofencing" 2,020,000 11,800 781 1,320 search news books scholar
"geo fencing" 330,000 2,160 538 1,760 search news books scholar
"geofence" 370,000 1,640 372 1,280 search news books scholar
"geo fence" 356,000 900 312 1,150 search news books scholar
--Marc Kupper|talk 22:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am ready to edit the article to change all instances of "geo-fence" to "geofence". This word has been quite common in civil engineering - especially GIS-related - for over 2 decades (Google Books will show you that). It is quite common in the English language to eventually drop the hyphen in a previously hyphenated word. For example, the word "ink-well" was broadly-adopted after 1840, peaked around 1900, and declined substantially through 1940. This is because the non-hyphenated "inkwell" took off after 1900, and continues to be the dominate spelling. With geofence, while both spellings have been increasing in usage since roughly 2000, "geofence" is quite dominant over "geo-fence". Having said all of that, I believe readers of this article could benefit from having a consistent representation of the word throughout rather than having every other word spelled differently.[1]

Philbayer (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

This article needs to be moved back to the correct title

edit

It looks like it was started with the correct title, then the term in the article was changed to the wrong spelling (with the hyphen), then at some point someone moved the title to match the spelling in the article. Now that the spelling in the article has been changed, this term needs to be moved back to the correct spelling, geofence. Coolcaesar (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 July 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 06:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


Geo-fenceGeofence – per previous ngram results and discussion. also possibility of using gerundive form instead (i.e., Geofencing) by suggestion of Ahecht. Tule-hog (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Tule-hog (talk) 02:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any reason not to move back to "Geofence". Vacosea (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.