Talk:Geoffrey Fieger

Mr. Fieger is one of the best trial lawyers

Mr. Fieger is one of the best trial lawyers, however, politics has stifled his ability to fight for his clients in the Michigan Court of Appeals and the Michigan Supreme Court...[1] See also [[2]]

--Frankoooo 04:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

You do realize that he illegally funneled money into political campaigns and attempted to blackmail the attorney general...right?

Epsoul 05:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Careful, say the wrong thing and his firm will sue you

POV tag

Fieger is a controversial, and oft-reversed, attorney, and the current version of the article gives no indication of it.[3] -- TedFrank 23:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

So find some stuff to put in, cite it, and add it in. Stusutcliffe (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I spent a little time today cleaning the article up - I added an infobox, put things in a more logical order, formatted it a bit better, and tried to find language that conveyed both Fieger's strengths and weaknesses. He's had a couple of notable professional successes, but he's also prone to shooting off his mouth and hitting himself in the foot (to mix a metaphor). In short he's neither a wizard nor a charlatan and and I think the balance is pretty fairly captured now. Seeing the history here of the POV tag, it's proper to remove it, and I've done so. JohnInDC (talk) 20:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Assertions

There is a section that an assertion in the section on what he said "that his opponent John Engler was the product of barnyard miscegenation;" The link to the Michigan Review is gone and it is repeated in the Washington Post without citation. Can we take this as a case of someone saying something like "a cross between a jackass and a dumb ass" or somesuch other, ill-chosen but not defamatory speech? Unless he said something specifically vulgar and offensive (that is citable) I am deleting this one. Petropetro (talk) 06:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I found the link at archive.org and am restoring the text. JohnInDC (talk) 12:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring it, turns out it was a direct quote according to the link. Hmm, I thought Feiger was usually snappier and cleverer than that. Now I'm wanting to go into Lexis-Nexis and see what the context was. (Maybe later today?) Petropetro (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Category change

There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy to delete the Category Detroit College of Law alumni. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geoffrey Fieger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901082406/http://newsroom.msu.edu/site/indexer/861/content.htm to http://newsroom.msu.edu/site/indexer/861/content.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)