Talk:Geometric topology
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Nbarth in topic Split off low-dimensional
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Split off low-dimensional
edit- Header added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I suggest splitting off low-dimensional topology from geometric topology. A sufficiently long article can be written on geometric topology, and otherwise, the low dimensional stuff will overwhelm this page. --C S (Talk) 02:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Certainly that's right. Geometric topology is no longer nearly synonymous with low-dimensional topology, if it ever was. Zaslav 08:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Did it. Now two pages. Please! will someone with some knowledge add (higher-dimensional) content to the page? Thank you! Zaslav 08:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks – I’ve added some content, especially on the distinction between low and high dimension (which was my first question in the topic, and took some time to answer).
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did it. Now two pages. Please! will someone with some knowledge add (higher-dimensional) content to the page? Thank you! Zaslav 08:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Geometric topology/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Needs expansion. Could start with overview of major topics and links with areas of mathematics. Tompw 18:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 18:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)