Talk:Geoneutrino
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Haegar1968 in topic I cannot believe no one mentioned Plutonium
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geoneutrino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
distinguishing them from solar neutrinos?
editThe article never explains how these neutrinos are distinguished from solar neutrinos.--76.169.116.244 (talk) 01:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Geoneutrinos (antineutrinos) are detected by the Inverse Beta Decay reaction, while solar neutrinos (neutrinos) cannot undergo this reaction due to lepton conservation. This should be added into the document. Scootalmighty (talk) 17:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Borexino's 2019 analysis
edithttps://scitechdaily.com/borexino-experiment-detects-signals-from-deep-inside-the-earth/ --62.11.73.229 (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
I cannot believe no one mentioned Plutonium
editWe talk about a giantic nuclear power plant that is not moderated. So that means fast neutrons which can breed limitless Plutonium and crack it again. Haegar1968 (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)