Talk:Georg Wittig

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

CH₃C(-)H-P-Ph₃ + PhCHO → PhCH=CHCH₃ + Ph₃PO

Ylide (or betaine) + Aldehyde -> Alkene

Those chemical equations up there were in the middle of the article. They did not make any sense being there at all. Was there a reason? I assume they're something Georg had something to do with, so I moved them here. --Phroziac (talk) 14:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, they represent the Wittig reaction, although it's odd that no-one gave them any context back in '05. Tomásdearg92 (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic