Talk:George (EP)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:George (EP)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Currently at Stub class, hints for improvement: Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album (very thin on description) N A track listing ('Video Clips' needs expansion) N Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) (include instrumentation) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C class: N All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art N At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section) N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. N Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims B class: N All the C class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS;Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 12:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)