Talk:George Adamson

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Editorial changes

edit

We have politely requested two times that you stop removing the fatheroflions.org link from the George Adamson link section on the wikipedia George Adamson page. Of the links on this George Adamson page the fatheroflions link is the most relevant and the site offers extensive information about George Adamson. Why do you keep repeatedly removing the link? Since you seemed upset about the previous correction to text about a 1999 movie, we must assume you do not like the fact that the fatheroflions site states that this movie was inaccurate about who took the cubs. What is written on that site about that movie is correct! Gareth took the cubs and wrote about them in his book Legacy of the Lions[1]. You certainly should not object to a website or persons telling the truth! It makes no sense. Nothing derogatory was said about Tony only the correct facts were given about there being inaccuracies. This is not an opinion, it is a fact. If any persons have a right be upset about this, it is Gareth and his admirers since in that movie credit for his rescuing the cubs was taken away from him and the credit given to another person! That is certainly a valid reason for persons being upset! A third time we ask you to stop removing the most relevant link on the George Adamson page, the fatheroflions link. If any links should be removed, it is not that link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gajaad (talkcontribs) 04:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lm945, Please view your Lm945 talk page for an additional message.

Please cease continuing to remove the link to the George Adamson information site fatheroflions.org from the link section on the wikipedia George Adamson page. Of the links on this George Adamson page the fatheroflions link is the most relevant and the site offers extensive information about George Adamson. Also please discontinue removing reference links to the fatheroflions.org films and books link and replacing it with a link to the commercial site Amazon. It is our understanding that directly linking to commercial sites is not allowed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gajaad (talkcontribs) 03:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Editorial changes, re: Gareth Patterson

edit

Someone keeps adding data regarding Gareth Patterson to George Adamson's page. Specifically, to the motion picture "To Walk With Lions."

Gareth Patterson had no involvement in the film, either in the story, or the film's development. It is inappropriate and inaccurate to add them to this page.

If you want to add Gareth Patterson to Wikipedia, please create a separate page for him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lm945 (talkcontribs) 20:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Death of George Adamson

edit

Is there any truth in the report that several lions arrived at his house the night before he was murdered, and filed past him, taking turns to lick his hand, as though saying farewell? 86.155.209.111 (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Adamson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply