 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Beeby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604063856/http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/members.nsf/1fb6ebed995667c2ca256ea100825164/720578c812c0d71fca256c8300044810?OpenDocument to http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/members.nsf/1fb6ebed995667c2ca256ea100825164/720578c812c0d71fca256c8300044810?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Reversion
edit@The Drover's Wife: Regarding your recent reversion, I'm wondering with what in the edit you take issue? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 02:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I already informed you on your talk page that you were in flagrant violation of the MOS. Your refusal to heed that suggests that your behaviour is probably not in good faith. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @The Drover's Wife: To which part of the MOS are you referring, specifically? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 04:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- As an aside, the reason I asked that you reply here is that this needn't be a bilateral conversation. I'm not sure why you would reply to a discussion on an article talk page on the user's talk page.
Your refusal to heed that suggests that your behaviour is probably not in good faith.
Uhh, what is my "refusal to heed that"? And I will ask you to observe WP:AGF. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 04:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)- I've made the problem with your edits clear, as you could see if you'd read literally any article on Wikipedia containing full dates of birth and death. I didn't write the MOS, so there's no point trying to argue with me here about it. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @The Drover's Wife: I take no issue with the MOS, but again, to what specifically in the MOS are you referring? Something in MOS:BIOLEAD? And given that was a small component of the edit you reverted, what are your other concerns? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 06:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I've made the problem with your edits clear, as you could see if you'd read literally any article on Wikipedia containing full dates of birth and death. I didn't write the MOS, so there's no point trying to argue with me here about it. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)