Talk:George H. Peck
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
George H. Peck (1856–1940) → George H. Peck — Request to move page back to George H. Peck as the date qualifier is unneeded (no other George Pecks have articles here). Pinkadelica♣ 06:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Support. There is no other George H. Peck on Wikipedia and it already redirects here anyway. Station1 (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support. The dates are a poor disambiguator, discouraged by guidelines, and in this case there's no need to disambiguate anyway. Andrewa (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support per above. PC78 (talk) 19:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I have to agree, date is useless, there is no other George H. Peck in wikipedia so date is absolutely useless --Poohunter (talk) 07:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
Sadly, this is just reversing a previous and apparently undiscussed series of moves, see [1] [2] for example. Andrewa (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- I saw that and tried to undo the move but I can't figure out how to undo it (hence the request). Pinkadelica♣ 00:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately an admin is needed to undo the move because there is more than one edit at the redirect. Station1 (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Possible speedy close? Any objections to one? Andrewa (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.