Talk:George Jameson (RNZAF officer)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Schwede66 in topic Did you know nomination
George Jameson (RNZAF officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 11, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from George Jameson (RNZAF officer) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Schwede66 (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that George Jameson was the highest scoring New Zealand night fighter pilot of World War II? Source: Shores, Christopher; Williams, Clive (1994). Aces High: A Tribute to the Most Notable Fighter Pilots of the British and Commonwealth Forces in WWII. London: Grub Street. ISBN 1-898697-00-0. Page 352 , Lambert, Max (2014). Victory: New Zealand Airmen and the Fall of Germany. Auckland: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 978-1-77554-043-4. Pages 241-243
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jubilee Memorial, Harrogate
- Comment: The second out of two QPQs from a double nomination.
Improved to Good Article status by Zawed (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 17:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC).
- Hi Onegreatjoke (talk); an excellent article from a user I am familiar with through WP:MILHIST. Article promoted to GA on 10 December; sources used are reliable and are cited inline throughout; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and cited, AGF on offline citation; I didn't find any issue with overly close paraphrasing from a check on the few online sources - Dumelow (talk) 13:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)