Talk:George Kenney/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Reedmalloy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 22:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • "He quit MIT after his father left" -- As in, his father left the family, ie divorce?
    • No, he just left. Like a divorce but without the divorce. Hawkeye7 (talk)
  • "Kenney was promoted to the temporary rank of lieutenant colonel on 2 March 1935, skipping that of major." -- Why did he skip a rank? Was it an appointment?
    • Yes. Added a bit. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
      • Just an additional explanation: One of the most contentious points in the Air Corps' friction with the General Staff was promotions, determined in the Army by seniority. Airmen were always behind the curve, as far back as 1920, primarily because most were not West Pointers and their requisite pilot training took a year before commissioning. Temporary promotions (allotted to a position assigned) were a compromise by which Air Corps officers could obtain rank equal to their peers in the other branches. GHQ Air Force legislation promoted four lieutenant colonels to temporary brigadier general to command GHQAF and its wings, and more junior officers to field grades for equivalent staff positions. The first permanent brigadier general for an officer commissioned in the Air Corps did not occur until January 1, 1937. (Henry Conger Pratt).--Reedmalloy (talk) 21:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • "As a result, Kenney was transferred to the Infantry School at Fort Benning, Georgia, on 16 June 1936, with the rank of major, to teach tactics to young infantry officers. He was finally promoted to the substantive rank of major on 1 October 1937." -- Might want to reword this, as-is it's confusing because it sounds like he was promoted to the same rank twice.
  • Dup link tool returns five results: Allies of World War II, South West Pacific Area (command), brigadier general, Douglas MacArthur, Paul Gunn.
  • Refs and FNs check out. Good job.
Just some minor points. Altogether an excellent article. —Ed!(talk) 23:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your review! Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Good work. Passing the article. —Ed!(talk) 11:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply