Talk:George Nevill, 5th Baron Bergavenny

Spelling

I changed the spelling of "Neville" to "Nevill" at one point, as both were used, which is confusing. I realise that spelling was not necessarily consistent at that time, but within an article here it probably should be? Also, although i changed it by dropping the terminal "e", i think we should look at consistancy across articles; the name is spelled "Neville" almost everywhere else in Wikipedia, and this is the usual spelling. Is there a compelling reason to keep Lord Bergavenny sans "e"? Lindsay H. 09:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Portrait

An editor with the IP address 74.99.88.54 changed the caption under the portrait today to read: 'This is Lord Thomas Cromwell (not George Nevill) by Hans Holbein the Younger'. No source is cited, so I'm changing the caption back to what it was, but leaving a note here in case someone comes up with a source which would justify the statement that the portrait is actually of Thomas Cromwell. NinaGreen (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Nevill, 5th Baron Bergavenny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120506184119/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1450.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/abergavenny1450.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)