Talk:George Pirie (publisher)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Pirie (publisher) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 3 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from George Pirie to George Pirie (publisher). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Footnotes
editThe footnoted references for this article should be formatted as inline linked citations per Wikipedia:Footnotes and Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style. -- Satori Son 04:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on George Pirie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130218053814/http://bayanne.info/Shetland/getperson.php?personID=I279308&tree=bayanne_1&PHPSESSID=73731752732d55acb2dacb7c217e8981 to http://bayanne.info/Shetland/getperson.php?personID=I279308&tree=bayanne_1&PHPSESSID=73731752732d55acb2dacb7c217e8981
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 3 June 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
– As of tonight's results in the 2022 Ontario general election, there are now four other George Piries listed on the disambiguation page, and it's not at all clear that this one is highly meganotable enough to outprimary all of the others. Per page view stats, over the last 90 days the plain title attracted an average of just one view per day and a peak of just five views per day — and even some of that was almost certainly from people who were expecting one of the other topics on the dab page. The dab page should be the plain title here; as is so often the case, the only reason the publisher actually has the plain title is that his article was the first one to exist. Bearcat (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support the artist has 40 views, the radiologist has 26 and the RAF officer has 8 compared with only 33[[1]] for the publisher. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nomination; Crouch, Swale and Ortizesp. There are five men listed upon the George Pirie (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the historical legacy of the 19th-century publisher looms so large as to overshadow the combined renown of the remaining four men. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)