Talk:George Rogers Clark National Historical Park

Latest comment: 7 months ago by BusterD in topic GA status concerns
Former good articleGeorge Rogers Clark National Historical Park was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 24, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 17, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the base of the main memorial (pictured) at George Rogers Clark National Historical Park, designed by Frederic Charles Hirons, has a dirt floor?
Current status: Delisted good article

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

edit

Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missing First Reference

edit

Somehow, the first reference to sculptor Hermon Atkins MacNeil seems to have disappeared. I presume that was a mishap when the image was added, as it would have come just below that. Miss Ivonne (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I just cut this out

edit

from the Marietta Mural section. The use of the words "our history" alone are probably enough, but the suggestion that this document ranks, "second only to the Constitution of the United States." really needs to be (opinion) referenced.

"The Northwest Ordinance July 13, 1787, in which this invention was embodied, also consecrated the region to freedom both of conscience and of labor. It provided the model for all subsequent territories. As a political document, it ranks in our history second only to the Constitution of the United States."

Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA status concerns

edit

This article is an older GA, but is not up to the modern GA criteria. Material about the history of the monument after its construction (for instance, management between construction and NPS management, or details of NPS management) are not included, the purpose and significance section is uncited, and not all material is supported by the existing citations. For instance, I'm not seeing where the count of paving stones in "removal, temporary storage, and numbering of approximately 1,000 large granite paving stones" is found in the source, or the reference to the sprinkler system later in the paragraph. If these issues are not addressed, the article may need to go to good article reassessment. Hog Farm Talk 15:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Even a quick reading of the lede demonstrates a more casual style than what we should expect in a modern GA. There's no question it's a GA-worthy subject. I see it's been listed for reassessment. BusterD (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply