Talk:George Spotton

History Conspiracy?

I am not sure whether or not George Spotton is a victim of some "history conspiracy" I think this is just that his ideas werenever implemented and there is very little to nil infromation on him. —This unsigned comment was added by Canuck mario (talk • contribs) .

It's unverifiable and is phrased in a way that makes it impossible to attribute anyway (because it is attributed to "some" anonymouse source, see Wikipedia:Weasel words for more on that). Since it doesn't meet Wikipiedia's editorial standards, I've removed it. It can be put back in if a good source can be found that has someone we can quote saying that.

(Aside: Note that first headers should use only two equal signs. Also, you can automatically sign your comments by typing four ~ [like "~~~~"] where you want Wikipedia to insert your name.) — Saxifrage ✎ 09:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks that clarifies things for me. Canuck mario 22:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

RuMOUR

who spells rumor "rumour" tha's just dumb Mack stevens 01:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you're probably talking to me. (FYI, it's spelled "rumour" in every country that has English as an official language except the United States.) I left a message on your talk page about this, but I'll summarise here. Wikipedia doesn't publish rumours, so that section is going to have to come out of the article entirely unless sources can be found for it. — Saxifrage ✎ 02:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

That is only because of the British Empire's hegemony of the past. SHAME!!!!!! Mack stevens 15:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Please leave your personal politics at home when editing Wikipedia. — Saxifrage ✎ 22:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)