Talk:George Street, Dunedin
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Traumnovelle in topic Undue weight to pedestrianisation
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editBest place in the world - wish i was there! :(
Perhaps the Princes Street part could be made into a new articleTshiels1 (talk) 02:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Probably a bit short for that to be necessary at the moment, but if it's expanded much it may be worthwhile - there's quite a bit on the history of Princes Street worth writing that would make it worthwhile as a separate article (e.g., the cutting through of Bell Hill). Grutness...wha? 02:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Undue weight to pedestrianisation
editThere is far too much weight given to the pedestrianisation of the street. It is entirely primary sourced and given too much detail for information we don't need to know. Will anyone care in 10 years time about some failed proposal relating to it? Traumnovelle (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)