Talk:George W. Bush military service controversy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George W. Bush military service controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index 1, 2 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Dan Rather's Interview With Marion Carr Knox
editUnder External Links, I have added Dan Rather's September 15, 2004 interview with Marion Carr Knox at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqVaNSzEgEw . Knox stated: "I did not type those memos," which had been shown on the broadcast. "However, the information in those is correct." I am wondering if these quotations should be incorporated in the article itself. Italus (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on George W. Bush military service controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021131053/http://www.billingsgazette.com/newdex.php?display=rednews%2F2004%2F09%2F11%2Fbuild%2Fnation%2F60-bush-pilot.inc to http://www.billingsgazette.com/newdex.php?display=rednews%2F2004%2F09%2F11%2Fbuild%2Fnation%2F60-bush-pilot.inc
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://wjwb.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WJWB%2FMGArticle%2FJWB_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031778123118&path=%21frontpage
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080830011231/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/20/bush_guard_records/index.html to http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/20/bush_guard_records/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607150053/http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews%2F1077963426278660.xml to http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews%2F1077963426278660.xml
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002039080_buckhead18.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on George W. Bush military service controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728095327/http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?talk%2F040301ta_talk_mayer to http://newyorker.com/printable/?talk%2F040301ta_talk_mayer
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527011318/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1023-03.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1023-03.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210121925/http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/departments/newsroom/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000543184 to http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/departments/newsroom/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000543184
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)