Talk:George Webster (presenter)

George Webster (presenter) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 9, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from George Webster (presenter) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the CBeebies presenter George Webster (pictured) has "effervescence, bubbly charm, a quick wit", and "an extra chromosome"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Webster (presenter).

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 5 months ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Webster, Briony May Williams, and Shani Dhanda in a 2021 Mencap video

... that the CBeebies presenter George Webster has "effervescence, bubbly charm, a quick wit", and "an extra chromosome"? Source: https://inews.co.uk/opinion/downs-syndrome-daughter-george-webster-cbeebies-representation-matters-1214250
- Reviewed: Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Tachikawa_Sumito

Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 230 past nominations.

Laun chba ller 10:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC).Reply

Starting review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Valereee (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Charming article, charming hook, wish we had a photo! Valereee (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't really understand copyright at all, although this YouTube video from Mencap seems to be marked as Creative Commons?--Laun chba ller 23:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hm...Mencap is believable as the copyright owner, and it's always fun to have a video as the image. Valereee (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Added to the article and here.--Laun chba ller 15:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

S.A.M.

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Launchballer I think S.A.M. is a fairly obscure film, so I have tweaked the wording to introduce it, please tweak further if necessary. TSventon (talk) 11:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 month ago20 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:George Webster (presenter)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 12:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 21:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will review this soon. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is good. I have no complaints here. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead looks good. No concerns. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See comments below. Otherwise, I checked about half the sources and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	2c. it contains no original research.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
	7. Overall assessment.	Great work. I have no complaints here and I'm going to go ahead and pass this article. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

a condition caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21 A news article isn't really an appropriate source for a medical claim. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cut; it's in the condition's article anyway.--Laun chba ller 22:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic

Archives (Index)