Talk:Georgetown University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sources

edit

Just curious as a Wikipedia 'n00b' -- do these sources meet WP:RS? I notice that two of them are Georgetown publications or pages, and thus might be considered "self-published"... MyNameWasTaken (talk) 04:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The referencing is indeed weak, and it does needs more third party sources, but I don't think anyone is challenging the notability of the school. References published by the article's subject are actually pretty common, so I wouldn't worry that the ones there now need to be removed. The article does need more length, with history, with a list of degree programs, with an overview of the buildings used, with some notable alumni (King Abdul! Laura Chinchilla!), and with references for all this.-- Patrick, oѺ 13:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgetown University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply