Talk:Georgia Guidestones bombing

biased

Why is this here? We don't yet know what caused the collapse. It MAY have been a bomb, but we don't know yet. What happened to Wikipedia's claim of being unbiased and objective? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:F4CE:3518:EC5E:CC03 (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Most news sources have reported that GBI is saying it was an explosive device. Click on one of the sources. Fbifriday (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

It was obviously an explosive device, aka bomb. No question there. Screendeemer (talk) 20:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

There is also video evidence of an explosion going off at night, obviously from an explosive device. It isn’t biased. Screendeemer (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

This is not we do do Wikipedia. We use sources and stick to them. The Independent, the one source used to support our "bomb" claim, says this: apparent bomb attack. The main Georgia Guidestones page accurately claims there is an investigation underway. We have to wait until authorities say this was a bomb, and cite them. petrarchan47คุก 22:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

There are now several sources calling it a bombing, and the Marca article actually cites investigators as saying several suspects detonated a bomb. It's a bomb. Fbifriday (talk) 00:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Destroyed

https://twitter.com/SwaniFiles/status/1544799763001901058?s=20&t=mgvthNqhIOVhyivPFb6qqw They've been demolished completely, if someone wants to include it. Fbifriday (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspect: Qanon

As nobody else seems to have a plausible motive it is highly likely, that this was the work of Qanon. Only they have a reason to do so. Why is this not mentioned ? The Article reads, if it were unexplainable (in the sence of motive unkonw) vandalism. If a Synogoge gets attacked, it is also mentioned immideatly, that an antisemitic background is likely. Thought it is difficult to descripe insanes like Qanon with a political word - Mass Hysteria ? Political Schizophrenia ?
Damn, I hate Qanons - they are pure evil. If they were Film-Villians, the writers would get criticised for "unrealistic characters" -- 87.181.81.25 (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

@87.181.81.25 you shouldn't be in Wikipedia. take your politics elsewhere. It's supposed to be about verifiable facts here. 202.161.64.231 (talk) 06:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

WIkipedia is not a place for original thought. While we can speculate on the political leanings of the people responsible for the bombing, it would be just that, speculation. Verifiable sources are needed before adding content to an encyclopedia. Fbifriday (talk) 06:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

But one thing that isn't speculation is that many prominent rightists are celebrating it variously as an act of heroism or divine providence. Don't hold back on posting those (well-cited, of course). MerscratianAce (talk) 09:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to add whatever content you want to the article yourself, if it is sourced. However, just be aware another editor may disagree with its veracity, neutrality, and relevance to the article. Fbifriday (talk) 16:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Georgia Guidestones explosion.webm

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)