Talk:Georgia v. Smith
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article and the comments below are strongly slanted to favor Remnant Church and the defendants, who were members of the same. Will someone please clean this up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.163.40 (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
What makes this case SO noteable
editMuch more information is available about this amazing high profile case and trial. I watched (and also recorded) the entire trial as it was broadcast live on Court TV's website in February, and have been interested ever since. Even the Judge in this trial told the jury how inaccurate all of the press coverage was. Having said that, I was disappointed daily by the discrepancies and blunders in the press reports and TV blurbs. Oddly, even what Court TV's website editorials ended up reporting was a poor reflection of the actual trial. I will try to follow the appeals process related to this trial closely, and would like to find the complete court transcript (from the court reporter, I mean). If the court transcript is available (anywhere) as an online reference, it would probably be a helpful and neutral reference in relation to this trial which was very interesting indeed.
I'm having to start using the news articles, but am certainly not interested in re-hashing what was reported about this case because they were boringly repetative and unnecessarily sensational (probably due to time, readership goals, ratings, etc.) The truth IS often stranger than fiction. These court proceedings were intensely dramatic and deeply informative without the extra hype. There is no need to add outside opinions or anything more than the facts here. Anyway, I would like to contribute much more to this article in the hope that it reflects the trial accurately (and not the news). This high profile case is very interesting, like Mike Nifong interesting, and could be for a long time. SqwikiKlean 21:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Georgia v. Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725183918/http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T1961103&pagesFile=9&currPage=1&cfn=20060080692 to http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T1961103&pagesFile=9&currPage=1&cfn=20060080692
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725183923/http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T3021189&pagesFile=8&currPage=1&cfn=20090069611 to http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T3021189&pagesFile=8&currPage=1&cfn=20090069611
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725183849/http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T3168399&pagesFile=2&currPage=1&cfn=20090133713&blocked=N to http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T3168399&pagesFile=2&currPage=1&cfn=20090133713&blocked=N
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.gasupreme.us/sc-op/op_summaries/nov_8.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101116163834/http://www.gasupreme.us/sc-op/pdf/s10a1281.pdf to http://www.gasupreme.us/sc-op/pdf/s10a1281.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725183627/http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/scripts/courtscr.dll/CriminalDocketDetail?caseno=06902974&source=%2FCriminalByName&color=1&D=7 to http://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/scripts/courtscr.dll/CriminalDocketDetail?caseno=06902974&source=%2FCriminalByName&color=1&D=7
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Georgia v. Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224153226/http://www.courttv.com/trials/smith/020607_background_ctv.html to http://www.courttv.com/trials/smith/020607_background_ctv.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070402103312/http://www.wsmv.com/news/10928264/detail.html to http://www.wsmv.com/news/10928264/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)