Talk:Georgian Labour Party

Untitled

why was the whole history of the party removed? admittedly it was messy and partisan but most of it was true and verifiable. i am researching georgian political parties myself(though i don't want to break the no original research rule so i'm not going to write the page). i find it strange that that a whole page should be obliterated when it could have just been cleaned. we need more not less on georgian politicsWillyD 11:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The article needs some serious revision. It reads very much like party prop. --Kober 10:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I think you can just paraphrase things you read in books and cite the books, right? If push comes to shove you can start a Patreon account and put your independent research there. 136.223.34.29 (talk) 12:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

This article had a copyright violation removed --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 10:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

This article is ridiculously bad on POV

This article reads like a piece of propaganda. Whole sections of the article are unsourced and read like praise pieces for the party. This article needs serious work.Jogarz1921 (talk) 02:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Does the Party no longer have a website?

I can't find it on a search engine. 136.223.34.29 (talk) 12:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)