Talk:Gerald Garson

Latest comment: 1 year ago by FieldMarine in topic Air Force service

NPOV/sources

edit

Some pretty important assertions being made here. Needs to have sources attached to them. Highfructosecornsyrup 22:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Middle initial in title

edit

Is there some reason this article is not titled Gerald Garson? --Fang Aili talk 22:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's been remedied. Ruthfulbarbarity 18:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Might use this space to collect a couple more possible sources to improve/expand this article. Avruch T 02:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tone

edit

Much of this article has a non-encyclopedic tone reminiscent of a "true crimes" magazine, including un-encyclopedic slang terms, sentence fragments, and dramatic development. In addition, the details of the sting and prosecution greatly dominate what purports to be a biographical article (even a picture of the courthouse). This might better be divided into two articles, one a biography and the other about the sting), or the breathless details edited down until the criminal case occupies a space proportional to its significance in the career of the person whose name is the article's title. Yes, it's an important aspect of his life, but it isn't 8/9ths of it. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article reflects the RS sources, which a review of them indicates. Shorter sentences are, as tests have shown, easier to read, comprehend, and retain. The longer sentence that was just manufactured of two shorter ones, for example, is arguable unhelpful to the reader. Too unwieldy. This article encapsulates and reflects what has been written in articles about the subject. As to what should be reflected, we reflect what the RSs reflect. If they saw fit to devote most of their coverage to the sting, we mirror that.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This artice is a fascinating read. Thank you. --Luckymelon (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edits by Nikkimaria

edit

As has been pointed out by another sysop, Nikkimaria has engaged in a series of edits here that degrade the article. I would ask her to desist, and I indicate my agreement with BHG, and ask Nikki to not edit against consensus.

I would also like to point out that I'm surprised, yet again, subsequent to me having a substantive disagreement with Nikki elsewhere, to see her making such controversial edits to an article I've previously brought to DYK, which attracts very, very few edits as a general matter. I'm happy that the assumption of good faith leads me to believe it is yet another coincidence. But would like to point out that such assumption is a rebuttable assumption. I hope I will not see a continuation of such statistically improbable coincidences. --Epeefleche (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I hope that as I continue to work through articles in need of reference improvements, I will see fewer from you. Looking at the edit in question, I'm having difficulty seeing what change might be seen as "degrad[ing]" the article. I did add some visible tags indicating where input from you is needed to complete references, but that is simply flagging an existing problem. Other than that, my edits were entirely consistent with community consensus. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gerald Garson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gerald Garson/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Garson was never charged with taking bribes to fix cases. See court transcripts April 2004, March, April, June 2007

Last edited at 20:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerald Garson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Air Force service

edit

Recommend adding rank and positions held (military occupational specialty or branch), duty stations, and more specific dates of service if ascertained in reliable sources. I was unable to locate any specifics about his service in Newspapers.com or Fold3 (a good source for primary documents on military service). Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply