Talk:German Citizenship Restoration
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corensearchbot
editIt searched on a small amount of text (the quote), not on the whole article, which I had not cut and pasted into the text yet. auntieruth (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Trying to add reference
editI was required to obtain proof of the following:
"The law does not require them to give up citizenship of whatever country where they currently reside."
I believe this confirmation may be of interest to others, so I am trying to add the following ref, can someone please help me format this correctly so the image does not get printed inline? [1]
Thanks Doug (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ See
Move to UK?
editThere is no source for the GCP closing in the US, or for it moving to the UK as the GCR (there was no source for the GCP at all until I just added it). On the contrary, I added a source for the GCR being set up in the UK as a new enterprise (by someone in the UK), without mention of the GCP. This needs to be either sourced, or, if wrong, corrected. I don't have the information to do this. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Article is not about its subject
editThe article as it is today barely touches on either the US GCP or the UK GCR, and states but does not establish that they are related; until I added it a few days ago there was no reference at all to either of these organizations. It has a brief introduction which mentions the organisations, but is otherwise all about "Depriving individuals of citizenship" and "Legal avenues to reclaim citizenship" (the article's 2 sections), which are dealt with comprehensively in other articles in which these issues are on-topic; it is really a minimal stub-article (the introduction) with lots of detail added that is not about its topic. The article urgently needs some information (with sources) on the Project/Recovery; as it is it perhaps merits deletion, regardless of the notability or otherwise of its ostensible, but undiscussed, subject.
These objections would be met by renaming the article German citizenship restoration (not in capitals, not about GCR Ltd), but personally I would consider this topic to be part of the German nationality law article, except that it could be considered to make the article too big, and worth hiving off into a separate article. Pol098 (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)