Talk:German cruiser Leipzig

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
Good articleGerman cruiser Leipzig has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starGerman cruiser Leipzig is part of the Light cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 2, 2013Good article nomineeListed
March 16, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:German cruiser Leipzig/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC) I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. addressed
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. OK
2. Verifiable with no original research:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. OK
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). OK
  2c. it contains no original research. OK
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. good coverage
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). OK
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. OK
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. OK
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. OK
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. OK
  7. Overall assessment. Points addressed

Comments

  • Two dablinks need fixing [1]
  • "and was scuttled in July 1946"
  • "and four of 7-cylinder"
  • "by six Mmarine-type"
  • needs a space between "12" and "x" in the infobox re: torpedo tubes
  • "since the end of World War I. in 1934"
  • "the battleship Gneisenau, and cruiser Deutschland"
  • " the light cruiser Köln'"
  • the "Baltic Sea", "Köln" and "Skagerrak" links are duplicated
  • no alt text on images (not required at GA)
  • suggest you convert to 13 digit isbn's (not required)
    • In my experience at FAC, the source people there want to keep the original 10-digit isbns for books that were published before 2007. Don't ask me why.
  • other toolbox checks all green (no action required)

Great article as usual. Just a couple of points to be addressed then she's fine to be promoted. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply