Talk:German destroyer Z51/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

• @Iazyges: I am confused with the article title. Is this article about a ship or a class. The first line of the lead speaks as if it is about a class, where as the later part says this is about a ship. Again, infobox is about class of ship. And the body is also confusing in that way. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

  It is a class that only possessed one ship; so the name of the article is the name of the ship, as per WP norm (unless they are part of a class which was supposed to have dozens of ships, but only had one laid down, and the rest cancelled, or some other extreme.) I'll make that more clear. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox;
  • Italics on "Kriegsmarine"
  •  Done
  • 1943–?
  •  Done
  • Link units and armaments in infobox
  •  Done
• Section 1;
  • Italics on "Kriegsmarine"
  •  Done
  • Link "two-stroke", "diesel engine"
  •  Done
  • was modified heavily; from which? the original design? Did it have complications that would delay the construction?

    From the original design; if I recall correctly it was hinted that the engines would take too long to build, since almost all naval resources were focused on U-boats at this time. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  • "the only ship of the class to be laid down"; this has already been mentioned in the para 1
  •  Fixed
  • RM? It is never defined before, if it is the currency define it in braces on the first mention
  •  Fixed
  • Her breaking up was finished on "in" February 1949
  •  Done
• Section 2;
  • Link "motor pinnace", "torpedo cutter", "anti-aircraft gun"
  •  Done
  • Be consistent on using the conversion template; 108 metres, 12.7-centimetre; check usage of hyphen
  •  Done
  • Also abbreviate the units from second mention
  •  Done

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: I believe I have done all you have asked.

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Do you have any more concerns? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)