Talk:Gerontology Research Group
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007 November 13. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This article is stunted, POV, even silly
editThe Gerontology Research Group is more than just a group of researchers who meet at UCLA. The idea that one must be somewhere in person is antiquated. In this age of telecommunication, tele-working, videoconferencing, e-mail, and a 24-hour, 7-day a week information economy, to suggest that only those who meet in person, and not those on the group discussion e-mail list, should not count is just plain hypocritical. After all, what would Wikipedia be if only those Wikipedes who meet with the Wikimedia Foundation in person were considered part of the Wikipedia editing team?Ryoung122 08:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
contradictions
editI flagged the last statement claiming "as of aug 20, 2015", where the supporting ref is from April 2015. also the list of the verified oldest people has >48 entries. if this list is different from teh gerontology group this should be made clear in the article. --Wuerzele (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- I resolved the contradiction by re-acessing the reference, updating the ref date and accessdate, and updating the number being tracked. The number at the list of verified oldest people need not be the same as the number here. Ca2james (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)