Talk:Get Carter/GA2

Latest comment: 3 years ago by PatTheMoron in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • The "short description" goes above everything (MOS:ORDER).
  • Add alt text for the film poster (WP:ALTTEXT).
  • Use plainlists instead of <br /> (template rules).
  • Is the reference after Ian Hendry necessary?
  • Same question for the one at the end of the 1st paragraph.
  • See MOS:'S for when to use 's instead of s'.
  • "home town" → "hometown"
  • Shouldn't "north-east England" be written as North East England?
  • There are now 2 short descriptions.

Plot and cast

edit
  • Plot is exactly 700 words so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • Add a comma after "At the funeral".
  • "under water" → "underwater"
  • "for audition" → "for auditions"

Production

edit
  • "which explored this freedom" → "that explored this freedom"
  • "MGM agreed a reasonable" → "MGM agreed to a reasonable"
  • Is there a word missing between "agreeing the deal"?
  • Is the comma after "early 2008" necessary?
  • Can we change all uses of "..." to "[...]" for consistency?
  • Again, should "north east" be capitalized?
  • "by the producer" → "from the producer"
  • #Post-production feels kinda small. Can it be merged with another section?
  • Other than that, everything else looks good.

Releases

edit
  • This section is normally titled "Release".
  • "tag-line" → "tagline"
  • "pump action shotgun" → "pump-action shotgun"
  • Add a comma after "in the finished film".
  • "Warner Brothers, copyrighted 2001" sounds weird. Reword?

Reception

edit
  • Try paraphrasing per WP:RECEPTION.
  • That's about everything in this section.

Remakes and legacy

edit
  • "which are directly borrowed" → "that are directly borrowed"
  • The last sentence in the first paragraph in #Legacy needs a source.

References

edit

This section needs the most work.

  • Sources from Blogspot and Discogs (#9, #10, #63) are not reliable.
  • YouTube uploads of certain scenes (#71, #72) are also not reliable.
  • WP:IMDB is prohibited from being used as a source (#73, #85, #123).
  • A check should be done to make sure each citation has an author/date/website listed.
  • Is the last source in #External_links (Clothes on Film) necessary?
  • Make sure to sort categories alphabetically.
  • Finally, archive sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Notes

edit
@PatTheMoron: Hope you're doing well. Everything looks better now. However, the last sentence in #Legacy still needs a source. After adding one or replying, ping me and I'll pass the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done, @Some Dude From North Carolina:! PatTheMoron (talk) 06:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply