Talk:Get Right

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Get Right article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jennifer Lopez Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jennifer Lopez, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jennifer Lopez on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jennifer LopezWikipedia:WikiProject Jennifer LopezTemplate:WikiProject Jennifer LopezJennifer Lopez articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

On June 2016, it was proposed that this article be moved from Get Right (song) to Get Right. The result of the discussion was Moved.

Fair use rationale for Image:Get Right Pt. 2 Cover.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Get Right Pt. 2 Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Get Right (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.viva.tv/charts/viva-single-jahrescharts-2005-2005-254/?start=50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Wikipedian Sign Language Paine 07:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Get Right (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.snepmusique.com/fr/pag-259376-Classements-Annuels.html?year=2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Wikipedian Sign Language Paine 07:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 June 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago13 comments11 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover) Wikipedian Sign Language Paine 10:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Get Right (song) → Get Right
Get Right → Get Right (disambiguation)

– Only subject called Get Right that has an article, other than the Counter-Strike player, but no one's seriously going to get confused by that, are they? Unreal7 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 02:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oppose – Disambiguation is good. Dicklyon (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's the plainest opposition reason I've ever read. Unreal7 (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Could reasonably be confused with both GeT_RiGhT and GetRight. Chase (talk | contributions) 23:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Chasewc91: A WP:HATNOTE would solve that problem. You don't see the other two articles disambiguated, why should this one? -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support as none of the other topics are convincing. SST flyer 02:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. The other articles are covered by WP:SMALLDETAILS. Dohn joe (talk) 00:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per Chase. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support. The song is the only thing with the name "Get Right" with a Wikipedia article, the others have differences in capitalization, spacing, or punctuation. WP:SMALLDETAILS are enough to distinguish between distinct topics. That's one of the reasons we use hatnotes. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support. Looking at what's actually on the dab page I'm confident this is the primary topic. Add a hatnote to GetRight if necessary, but I think this comes under SMALLDETAILS. Jenks24 (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support - I'm not necessarily convinced by the small details argument myself, but I don't think that even needs to come into the discussion. The song is primary over the two articles GetRight and GeT_RiGhT anyway. — Amakuru (talk) 07:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support Small details. Timmyshin (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Get Right. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic