Talk:Gethsemane (The X-Files)
Gethsemane (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Gethsemane (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Gethsemane 4x24.jpg
editImage:Gethsemane 4x24.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Gethsemane (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 04:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Picture: Maybe expand the rationale on the image page a bit, just to be safe
- As I was working on the rationale, I realised the image isn't really that important; it doesn't really show anything that's discussed properly. I've removed it from the infobox and added a free image to the article to illustrate it instead. GRAPPLE X 00:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Production: Maybe cite the "Believe the Lie" change, either if its in the Meisler book or use the episode
- Fixed, I'd put the citation a sentence too early. GRAPPLE X 03:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Production: Not a big deal, but is there any more info on the "existence of God", as that seems like that's a big deal and could be expanded. If not, no biggie
- I re-read some of the reviews and production material, but aside from Carter no one mentions it; the ending seems to have been the main talking point for critics. GRAPPLE X 03:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Reception: "An article in the Wall Street Journal discusses fan theories…" 'discusses' should be 'discussed'
- Reception: "…while a cartoon ran in The New Yorker a few weeks later surrounding Mulder's 'death'." This entire sentence needs a citation (or two)
- I've added one, but it's just a repeat of the citation used already; all of those sentences preceding that ref were supported by it. GRAPPLE X 00:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Reception: "Series creator Chris Carter noted that "the whole plot line of "Gethsemane" revolved around a hoax…" Change the "-" around Gethsemane to '-'
- Reception: I know the Den of Geek named Michael Kristchgau as one of the "Top 10 X-Files Baddies" for his appearance, and the article explicitly mentions "Gethsemane" (although it spells it wrong)
- Added this information, thanks for finding that. GRAPPLE X 01:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Have addressed some of these points; will work on finding more info about the religious themes and adding that Den of Geek mention. GRAPPLE X 00:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Have commented on everything and addressed all that could be addressed. Thanks for taking a look at this one for me. GRAPPLE X 03:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Awesome! Looks good. I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Have commented on everything and addressed all that could be addressed. Thanks for taking a look at this one for me. GRAPPLE X 03:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gethsemane (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111215051431/http://www.ugo.com/tv/tv-best-season-finales-the-x-files-gethsemane to http://www.ugo.com/tv/tv-best-season-finales-the-x-files-gethsemane
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)