Talk:Gettysburg furniture companies
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Initial page
editAs one of those who tagged this article as "confusing/notable/etc", just to say that I am working with the original editor of this text on a better article. If you have any questions, please leave me a message. Rgds, - Trident13 10:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm confused because of two things:
- It says it came from a letter (directly copied) which is a possible copyvio issue
- It reads like a general overview of furniture manufacturing in the area, with one sentence dedicated to the subject in the title. --Wafulz 18:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't disagree with much of that originally, and why I put up the various tags including notability tag when it arrived as a new page. However, I have since found out that the letter was a responce to a question posed by the original poster (so as a correspondee, it wouldn't nominally break copyright) - and secondly, he's very new to wiki: hence why it looks awful! I agree that a better title needs to be found for the article if 'posed' in its current format, which is a history of Gettysberg furniture more than its about Reesor itself. I will keep working with the original poster on a far better article. Rgds, - Trident13 12:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Gettysburg furniture companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040517161102/http://www.adamslibrary.org:80/newwebpage/Verticalfile/adamscohistoryvfile.html to http://www.adamslibrary.org/newwebpage/Verticalfile/adamscohistoryvfile.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Gettysburg furniture companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://newspaperarchive.com/newspapers1/na0008/319852/3457433.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)