Talk:Ghana Freedom/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 10:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Immaculate

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Copyvio detector shows up well. Referenced suitably

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Having had no prior knowledge, I was well educated

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Although the majority of the reception was praise, it was well backed up by sources.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable, only one prior editor.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images would be extremely useful in this situation. Cannot find any, however

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very well written and verified. Will need photos for improvement, as mentioned