Although the notability of a few of the individuals extensively listed in this article is clear in that they have their own articles (or their spouses do), the vast majority, say 90%, are clearly not notable at all. This entire article is against NOTGENEALOGY, frankly, and seems like a vanity edit. The "founder" of the family in Van Diemen's Land isn't himself notable, which would lend some validity to the concept of a dynasty descending FROM him being more inherently notable than would a family such as this clearly is, descending from a not-at-all-notable man. This is just a commonly-encountered case of a family settling in a place, proliferating, and a few of them being of some note in the region. The family itself isn't inherently notable at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.196.238 (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
