Talk:Giddens Ko

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Rewrite

edit

Before I came across this article. It looked like this. Terukiyo had fixed grammar and added citation needed tags in May 2013. The only thing I found online that was close to verifying that version of the article was this paper, published 29 November 2012. However, the blurb on page 21 of the research paper is strikingly similar to the article as edited by Terukiyo. One of the sources for the paper is even listed as Chinese Wikipedia, which is why I did not use the paper as a source for the English article on Ko. This is not meant as a copyright infringement claim against Terukiyo. Again, the student's paper cited Wikipedia, and I want to note, due to WP:RS, WP:Circular,etc ., that the research paper is not a suitable reference to the Ko article. Please do not revert and use the research paper as a source. Vycl1994 (talk) 05:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giddens Ko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply