Talk:Gilberto Barragán Balderas

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MX in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gilberto Barragán Balderas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 20:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —♠Vami_IV†♠ 20:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Prose

edit
  • In 2010, the U.S. Department of the Treasury sanctioned Barragán Balderas under the Kingpin Act and froze all of his U.S-based assets. It prohibited U.S. citizens and entities from conducting business with him. Condense.
  •  Fixed
  • Relevant pictures should be added to break up the walls of text.
  •  Done I've added a public domain pic with the leadership chart of the Gulf Cartel/Zetas where the subject is shown too.
  • Los Zetas should be linked at its first mention in the article text, in "Early life and background", rather than in "Career and indictments".
  •  Fixed Nice catch, done.
  • an AR-15 rifle with two embedded chargers [...] two .9 mm handguns with embedded chargers What's a charger in this context?
  •  Fixed I'm not an expert in firearms, but I googled it to make sure and apparently it is known as a "charging handle". In Spanish the text simple says cargadores.

GA progress

edit
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.