GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 14:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry but this article, although long-standing and with many good qualities, is not ready for GA. Many claims, indeed whole sections, are uncited. There are in addition some open tags requiring further explanation and rewording. The Consumption section, which could well contain cited text summarizing the history of gin cocktails, instead contains an out-of-place list of "classic gin cocktails" (says who? source? is this comprehensive? source? -- it doesn't match the "Gin" list in List of cocktails#Gin, which contains items not listed here, to begin with, and given that the list exists, there is no need for it here.) and "notable brands" (ditto; and again, some cited text discussing the history and geographic distribution of the brands (or a map, perhaps) would be more apposite). I've therefore marked the article as having failed GA at this time. Once the article is fully-cited, the tags have been resolved, and the other issues raised addressed, the article may be brought back to GAN. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)