Talk:Ginglymodi

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Splitting of Lepisosteiformes

Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not sure why it's necessary to keep Lepisosteiformes as a redirect to here, I don't know of any other extant fish order that has its page redirect to a stem-group. Not to mention that this basically makes this page paraphyletic, since it covers both basal ginglymodians and lepisosteiformes while allowing Semionotiformes to have their own page. There are plenty of higher-order taxa out there which have small pages, doesn't mean that their well-documented subtaxa should be merged with them. Don't really think that this is a case where lumping the pages is warranted. Geekgecko (talk) 20:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Lepisosteiformes as a whole (including extinct members) is not really discussed separately from the broader Ginglymodi. I would be more open to a split if you were willing to put more effort into actually writing a proper article about Lepisosteiformes, including its fossil representatives, rather than just creating a short stub just for the sake of doing so. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well, the article had to start somewhere. I can later add more information about the biogeographical history of the group based on Deesri et al (2016), Cavin et al (2018), and Cavin et al (2019) if I recreate the page, in addition to adding more info about basal ginglymodian biogeography to differentiate them from Lepisosteiformes. Geekgecko (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's been made. Geekgecko (talk) 16:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic