Talk:Gino Cavicchioli
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.ginocavicchioli.com/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009010910020309. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Untitled
editThere is an OTRS ticket about this at Ticket:2009010910020309. Currently resolving some details. Stifle (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- It does not look likely that we will receive an acceptable license release for this text. Stifle (talk) 10:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Scratch that, permission received. Stifle (talk) 18:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
editAccording to the text available now on this page.. there is no more conflict of interest. Information is neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.42.89 (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The COI is still obvious and blatant. DreamGuy (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
User Mcavicchioli (talk) and user Northern lights 3000 (talk) appear to be the same editor? They both seem to have very close access to the subject and be editing with a conflict of interest. TeapotgeorgeTalk 09:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion, fact is fact, regardless who told it. I would like someone to point out to me which sentence in that short paragraph about Gino Cavicchioli actually violated "NPOV". Ruoerx (talk) 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, and the article needs more facts and far less self=promotion. The editors in question are obviously spamming the site, as their edit history shows the person being added to articles that have no bearing on this person. Well, and of course there's no use talking to you, as you have no edit history and appear to be ye another sockpuppet account promoting this person. DreamGuy (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gino Cavicchioli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://cfl.scalar.mrx.ca/article/portrait_of_the_artist_known_as_the_bust_man - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070301084350/http://www.hamiltonscores.com/football/news/?article=092922426 to http://www.hamiltonscores.com/football/news/?article=092922426
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)