This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Update
editI question the fact that this person (for what pertains his fight to introduce GMO corn in Italy) is "low relevance". In 2010 the NYT published a long article about him (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/world/europe/24modify.html?_r=0). Mr. Zanonato's position is a minority position in Italy, so what?
The page should be updated to reflect the May 8th 2013 decision from the European Court of Justice (Order of the Court - 8 May 2013 Fidenato Case C-542/12). Here is the decision in Italian and in French. The ruling is important because it states that under EU law an EU member state cannot prevent subject farmers that want to grow GMO to an authorizatin procedure IF the GMOs have already been properly authorized under EU rules and regulations (notice that is my short and rough summary: unfortunately as of today there is no official English text available).
Indeed this page is overlong and it should be edited and made more readable, but I don't agree that it is not relevant.
Straje —Preceding undated comment added 09:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Untitled
editThe person described doesn't have a Italian wikipedia's page. In fact, no-one knows him in Italy (reference material come all from the same auto-produced base). In GM maize debate, their position is a clear minorance. I want to enphatize that I'm absolutely not against their position, but this page is a clear self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisbeta (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
This page is clear self-promotion, there isn't any encyclopedic relevance. --Crepuscolo1910 (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)