Talk:Girls (TV series)

Mention of this show in Supernatural

Is it okay to add a section about that? In Supernatural Episode 8.23 'Sacrifice' the King of Hell rants about 'Girls', claiming that Sam would be his Marnie and that Hannah deserves to be loved. Is it worth mentioning? 89.14.215.13 (talk) 23:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Viewers

Can we mention that viewership fell in the second season? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.91.130 (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Transphobia

Under the Feminism section it mentions that the show has been criticized for transphobia. By whom and on what grounds? It seems a bit farfetched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.90.50.211 (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I've found an article talking about a transphobic joke in the show. It's a crude brief joke, told offhandedly enough that it doesn't seem to be all that self-aware.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140127130542/http://originalplumbing.com/index.php/politics-activism/news-politics/item/723-t-girls-lena-dunham-and-casual-transphobia

Even though it's really just one occurrence to my knowledge, and I'm not personally hurt by it, I don't think I feel comfortable removing the statement. I will just add this link as a citation so others can see for themselves. PalmyranRealness (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I’m not sure I can even remember there being a trans character or a reference to transgenderism over the course of the show. I think I may take it out if I don’t think of anything. PalmyranRealness (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Broadcast section

This is the first time I've noticed name-dropping in a Wikipedia article. If there is any other purpose to the final paragraph, I'm missing it. I seriously think that the following can be deleted without any loss whatsoever:

Models Karlie Kloss, Karen Elson, and Hilary Rhoda; designers Nicole Miller, Cynthia Rowley, and Zac Posen; and editors Anna Wintour, Joanna Coles, and Amy Astley were all in attendance.[72] The after party was at the Allen Room and "hosted by HBO and the Cinema Society".[72]

... but I won't do it (now) because I am not well enough acquainted with the subject of the article and I might be deleting something of value even though I cannot detect any. Dratman (talk) 23:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girls (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120420035907/http://gawker.com:80/5902308/small-girl-big-mouth-a-girls-recap to http://gawker.com/5902308/small-girl-big-mouth-a-girls-recap
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120818190945/http://tvcritics.org:80/2012/06/07/the-television-critics-association-announces-2012-tca-award-nominees/ to http://tvcritics.org/2012/06/07/the-television-critics-association-announces-2012-tca-award-nominees/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

On legacy

• 6 Ways ‘Girls’ Changed Television. Or Didn’t. NYT

czar 23:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

It's become a bit of a prototype for the new kind of tv series that focuses much less on actual storylines than on "fly on the wall observation" of a certain sociocultural environment. The narrative arc becomes vague and endlessly extendable. Mad Men had something of that too. In two pieces recently in Guardian, two different writers have pointed out this aspect of Girls, and how it made it difficult to give the show a "proper ending" because the fans are so poss4essive of the characters that they simply don't want to have to lose their sompany. Article 1) https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/apr/17/girls-finale-tv-endings-seinfeld-mad-men and 2) https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/apr/24/tv-endings-breaking-bad-walking-dead-big-little-lies

Zoe Williams in the second one: "The different rhythms of reality TV have also seeped into drama so that, as Sweden’s leading TV critic Kjell Haglund says: “The art of fiction TV is moving from telling traditional stories towards depicting social environments.” It’s something you can also see in Girls, not just the show itself but in the ferocious sense of ownership among its fans". Sex and the City had the same devoted, even tribal bond between its fans, the lead characters and a glamourized Manhattan environment. Girls is much less obviously romantic than SATC, but it's the same kind of narrative trend we're seeing. 46.195.40.45 (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Lead Section

After seeing style note suggestion expansion of the lead section's summary, I added a paragraph about the controversy and accolades, as well as including the information that Judd Apatow is an EP. I think it would be good to include something mentioning that the opportunity to create the show arose out of the success of Tiny Furniture as well as a little more information about the plot/thematic content beyond the current "...following the lives of four young women living in New York City". 66.165.13.239 (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Girls (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116211306/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2014/01/girls-season-4-andrews-rannells-confirms-series-regular-status.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2014/01/girls-season-4-andrews-rannells-confirms-series-regular-status.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gawker.com/5902308/small-girl-big-mouth-a-girls-recap
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://tvcritics.org/2012/06/07/the-television-critics-association-announces-2012-tca-award-nominees/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170112160404/http://www.ezydvd.com.au/blu-ray/girls-season-1/dp/6118955 to http://www.ezydvd.com.au/blu-ray/girls-season-1/dp/6118955
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311134159/http://www.ezydvd.com.au/blu-ray/girls-season-2/dp/6144418 to http://www.ezydvd.com.au/blu-ray/girls-season-2/dp/6144418

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft article relating to HBO controversies

Hi, I know that HBO made controversies surrounding it's original programming as a draft, as Draft:HBO controversies. CastJared (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

NOT BAD, DUDE! 187.138.115.191 (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)