Talk:Gittins index

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pychron in topic Citations


Untitled

edit

I don't think the discussion regarding the selection of technologies is relevant to the Gittins index itself. Investing in technologies is not really parallel to the N-armed bandit problem except at a superficial and probably artificial level. 165.125.144.16 (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think you are right, but this example appears often in relation with the Multi-armed bandit process. Indeed what one does in the selection of technologies is to gather information in a bayesian way and the states of the process are probability distributions, which are called belief state. There is an algorithm for computing the Gittins index in such a setup but it is quite complex and I agree that it would be just misleading in an introductory example. Pychron (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article's name

edit

Shouldn't Gittins' have an apostrophe? Henriqueroscoe (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, in the literature it does not, example Pychron (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Editor Pychron is correct that the literature refers to the "Gittins index", just as mathematical literature referes to Hilbert space, Hardy space, Haar system, Haar measure (Hardy-Haar-Haar), Wald test, etc. Mathematical and scholarly practice differ from the recommendation of Strunk and White, who prescribe an apostrophe for forming the possessive for proper names (save Jesus and Moses). Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 10:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Correct interpretation of Exploration vs Exploitation

edit

The section "terminology" mentions a Bernoulli process with unknown probabilities. I would remove that reference: the basic Gittins index deals with processes whose probabilistic structure is known. The classical example of explotiation vs exploration refers to projects in which the course is unknown but the odds for every decision stage are known. Pychron (talk) 14:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

The references [7] and [8] are different papers on the same place. Jj14 (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I don't get this, could you get more explicit? Pychron (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
ref 7,8,9:
Chen, Y.R. and Katehakis, M.N. (1986). "Linear programming for finite state multi-armed bandit problems", Math. Oper. Res., 11(1), 262–268
Kallenberg, L.C.M.(1986). "A Note on MN Katehakis' and Y.-R. Chen's Computation of the Gittins Index", Math. Oper. Res., 11(1), 262–268
Katehakis, M., Veinott, A. (1987). "The multi-armed bandit problem: decomposition and computation." Math. Oper. Res., 12(2), 262–268
Jj14 (talk) 23:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I have fixed it. Pychron (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply