Talk:Giving You Up/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   The article contains dead links. According to WP:GOODCHARTS the article should never use "Top40-Charts.com" as a source, further Acharts should not be used either as it states "Good and Featured class articles should not rely on unlicensed archives as convenience links, and should use official sites and licensed archives where possible."

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Charts section is a mess. Each individual chart needs a ref, not 2 links for all. Especially when the two links arnt reliable. Youtube never to be used as a link also i highly doubt "MixKylie.co.uk" is reliable, especially cause you have to create an account.

   C. No original research:

   Live performance section is unsourced. Formats and track listings is unsourced. Unsourced section under Background and release

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   "File:Giving-you-up-screencap.jpg" , "File:KylieMinogue Giving You Up.ogg" , "File:KylieMinogue Made of Glass.ogg" all fail WP:NFCC but more so the audio samples as you have no composition section.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Okay, i do not think there is anyway this article is going to pass a reassessment. I deeply apologize if that comes across as harsh as i didnt mean it that way. There simply isnt enough coverage on the song to meet GA standards. I will give you 2 days to prove to me and make corrections to the article and explain to me why this should remain a GA. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 07:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)