Talk:Glåmdal

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge proposal
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glåmdal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

Back in April 2019 the proposed merging Glommadal into Glåmdal, giving the justification (in an unsupported reason field in the merge template):
The name Glommadal is not in use in Norwegian, and anything that is said here can also be said about Glåmdal.
Thoughts? Klbrain (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Given no objections,     Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply