Talk:Glacier Peak
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Philoserf in topic Probable error in the Geology section.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glacier Peak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Glacier Peak has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Images
editThis article could use more images for GA. Black Tusk (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- √, I think. Ceran→→ 23:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Probable error in the Geology section.
editThe ‘Geology’ section states, “In the Dusty Creek, located by the mountain, there is a lahar at least 6 km (3.7 mi) thick“.
That is nearly 20,000 feet, which makes no sense. Could it be referring to the width?73.164.63.46 (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have reviewed the source and corrected the value. —¿philoserf? (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)