Talk:Glaze3D

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (9 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Confusion

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"The 1200 model's claimed specifications would place it as the rough equivalent of the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra or Radeon 9200 Pro, while its claimed performance would place it at the same level as the GeForce 3 Ti 500 or Radeon 8500."

So, which one is it? --Iceheart3910 17:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The performance claims were being made by Bitboys and so were compared to cards of the time. I think the author of the article was comparing the technical specifications to cards that came later (that is to say, the GeForce FX and Radeon 9000 series were built with the number of units/pipeline configs/etc. that the Glaze3D would have had). Tech specs and actual performance could see large discrepancies, so even though no actual hardware was made, despite its ambitious futuristic design it still could have performed worse than the claims. Fishy c (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic