Talk:Glee: The Music, The Christmas Album

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Gatoclass in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleGlee: The Music, The Christmas Album has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 24, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that besides their usual pop fare, the Glee cast sang hymns in traditional arrangements on Glee: The Music, The Christmas Album?

Sources

edit

Add to Personnel, please!

edit

Chord sings on "The Most Wonderful Day of the Year"! ;D 75.68.52.240 (talk) 18:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

He is actually not credited with any vocals per allmusic. Yves (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah,, well he is per the freakin' CD booklet! (Plus, he deserves it! He's totally getting the Dijon treatment if you know what I mean!) 75.68.52.240 (talk) 12:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you have a copy of the CD booklet, you can add Chord to the performers using Template:Cite album-notes to reference the relevant information :) Frickative 12:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand. Can someone else do it? (And do I need a pic?) 75.68.52.240 (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

You don't need a pic, but it can only be filled out by someone who has a copy of the CD booklet. You just have to fill in the blanks, like so:
{{cite album-notes
| title       = Glee: The Music, The Christmas Album
| albumlink   = Glee: The Music, The Christmas Album
| artist      = [[Characters of Glee#Casting|''Glee'' Cast]]
| year        = 2010 
| notestitle  = None given.
| first       = None given.
| last        = None given.
| authorlink  = N/A.
| coauthors   = None.
| page        = 3
| format      = CD booklet
| publisher   = [[Columbia Records|Columbia]]
| publisherid = 88697 78567 2
}}

Let me know if you need any more help :) Frickative 13:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! 75.68.52.240 (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Publisherid refers to the catalog number, which should be written on the spine. If not, it should be in small font in the album booklet. It may contain letters and should be from eight to twelve characters. As for the page number, I would count the cover of the booklet as page one. Yves (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

There ya go! :D 75.68.52.240 (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Are there any other personnel on any other pages that aren't included on the page? Yves (talk) 22:11, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
) Probably, but I'm not gonna go looking now. Mabye later, though! ;D 75.68.52.240 (talk) 00:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk17:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Kingsif (talk). Self-nominated at 06:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC).Reply

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   I looked at the edits made in the last few days, and considered that blacklisted material had to be removed. When I looked at the expansion of the prose (excluding the "Track listing", "Personnel", "Charts and certifications", and "Release history" sections) I see that the article was about 6588 characters before expansion, and 21827 afterwards, below the 5x expansion requirement on DYK. I think the community will need to decide if they want to WP:IAR so this hook can be promoted to the Christmas hook set, possibly by opening a discussion on WT:DYK. I am also happy to post the request on your behalf, explaining my rationale. This will all be moot if the article is promoted to GA.

In terms of hooks, I like ALT7 the best, but remove the word "actually". All the hooks are cited and can be used. Z1720 (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Z1720: Thanks :) I wrote down 6494 for the bytes pre-expansion, but that's still short. I'd presumably ask at DYK talk to see if someone would pick up doing a GA review, I don't think it would be reasonable to add any more to the article (without getting too detailed and too broad). I have removed "actually" from alt7 (personally, I am disappointed in that hook, because I still have yet to work out a hook-y way of noting that "Last Christmas" was last Christmas). Kingsif (talk) 06:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Z1720: Update, GA passed. Kingsif (talk) 16:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
  W()()T W()()T! Expansion concern is no longer a problem. I have been trying to formulate a reword for ALT7 but haven't been able to come up with anything. Maybe a hook prepper will think of better wording. Z1720 (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply