This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Glenn Albrecht is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
When a researcher or writer publishes a new idea (e.g. Solastalgia), that idea is born into the world as a new entity. For the same reason that George W. Bush's biography is not a logical subsection of George Sr.'s bio... Solastalgia belongs in its own article--with mutual links between itself and the Glenn Albrecht bio. If/when someone performs this split, some knowledgeable/diligent attention should be given to properly splitting the citations. Cheers Kierah (talk) 04:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I vote Split, as per Saudade7. I ended up here by trying to look up solastalgia and think it merits its own article. Solastalgia was mentioned in an article on BBC News Online which suggests that as an idea it's reached mainstream notability. Fenros (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
